A Tale of Authoritative Undecidability

By Marc Gauvin

Copyright © 6/10/2018
Reproduction expressly granted provided attribution is given and original link is provided.

 

Once upon a time someone disrupted the social theorists with some facts that they happened to have overlooked but couldn't accept because then they and everyone might realise that they don't have a clue about what they are talking about. So the social theorists agreed to disagree on everything except for the following dictum:

"Truth cannot be known other than for isolated trivia and for that reason it is delegated to simpleton scientists and engineers while the big decisions and complex problems are to be left to us social theorists for which we will avoid decidability at all costs, because that kind of nonsense is just for scientists and engineers and their isolated trivia. Oh and yes, we will invent a pseudo science called economics to put order out of our inherent disorder while keeping everything comfortably undecidable."

Subsequently, the social theorists bamboozled the public, divided it and pitted it against itself over a vast range of theories and proposals eloquently spoken in undecidable logic, about all no one can know about including themselves but that must be decided! Thus,  using hindsight for foresight they dictated the "will of (the) people" to the scientists and engineers as to how they are to implement their simplistic isolated trivia as long as it was in the most economically undecidable fashion possible.

This gave way to fantastic undecidable achievements so unprecedented that they quickly out grew their resource base and unleashed wonders such as atomic energy/bombs, depletion of resources, destruction of the environment, evermore refined tools of killing and torture (doubling as entertainment), destruction of culture and any particular way of life, mass communication/surveillance, compelling, unfulfilling and addictive entertainment, and many more undecidable wonders,  and of course, the systematic suppression of any spontaneous uncomfortable decidability other than that related to engineering and scientific trivia.

The key players in all this marvelous "progress" thought they were making great headway by a phenomenon invented in economics called profit. Profit was the most amazing invention only possible if we maintain undecidability of course, those genius economists got that right! You see the invention was what made  their particular unit of value measure so unique from all other measures in the universe, defined (undecidably) so as to incorporate into all "measures" of value and merit, a component that just happens to be entirely disassociated from any value or merit and not only that,  it had the fantastic capacity to compound as a function of itself.

The engineers and scientists at first were skeptical,  until they remembered the comfort of undecidability so ingenuously built into everything on purpose.  But more important than that, if they ever even implied that economics should be decidable they weren't going to get any of those magic units!

Then suddenly the social theorist realised that without at least the semblance of decidability they could not enforce anything in a way everyone would accept without bludgeoning them,  so they informed the Judiciary that just happened not to study science, engineering or economics, that they should have decidability.

And so here we are, we can continue with this nightmare in comfortable undecidability or we can show the judiciary that economics needs to be decidable or at least its unit of value and merit must be,  because that is the only way their decisions can be judiciously decidable.

 

 

 

Break out of  "The Money PSYOP" and give your kids

a future they can be proud of you for by supporting the MSTA


 

 

Saints in Hell

By Marc Gauvin

Copyright © 4/10/2018
Reproduction expressly granted provided attribution is given and original link is provided.

 

Essentially, if the world were made up of saints that for whatever reason unwittingly embraced our current misrepresentation of money as an immutable fact and thus assumed in a spirit of honesty its subsequent logical imperatives as equally inevitable, the systemic effect of such collective adherence would produce the same insane and unconscionable levels of inequity we witness today. Each saint being attributed responsibility in terms of their circumstance rather than their deeper saintly nature. Those seeking equity, justice, fairness, compassion and integrity in themselves and others oblivious of how such behaviour is precluded by such systemics, would become tyrannical in their quest or abandon all hope.

The key to undoing the vast compounding calamity we are witnessing in the world, believe it or not, lies in correcting that single most ubiquitous and influential proposition that all are conditioned to incorporate in their lives as an immutable fact, known to all as simply "money" as currently misrepresented.

The beauty of this, is that doing so (correcting money's misrepresentation), under no circumstances can be misconstrued as harmful to anyone in any way, nor can it empower anyone or any group over the rest, it simply means greater transparency and massive reduction of risks and liabilities across the board and for all rich and poor and it represents empowerment of all the causes that while no one would deny, are never served because of our current financial prerogatives under the yoke of money's misrepresentation not any other human or material resource limits.

The knowledge of money's misrepresentation and the prospect of correcting it, is not a fantastical wishful dream, it is a hard hitting factual disruption of a nightmare the type that can only engender a deep sense of relief once one is fully awakened from it,  as it is a cause to enable all causes.

 

 

 

 

Break out of  "The Money PSYOP" and give your kids

a future they can be proud of you for by supporting the MSTA


 

 

Brief History of Money's Misrepresentation and "Credit"

By Marc Gauvin

Copyright © 2/10/2018
Reproduction expressly granted provided attribution is given and original link is provided.


If money is a measure of value then it cannot also be a commodity including what is called "credit" or "trust". That is, while money may measure the amount of value that parties concede in a spirit of credit/trust, it itself is not the trust but just a measure of the amount of value being entrusted. Every "seller" forfeiting value to the community is an issuer of trust to the community and every buyer whose balance falls below zero is a recipient of trust again from the community.

How has the irrational conflation of value, commodity and credit/trust come about? Well, historically the use of fungible commodities as relatively durable, divisible, and transportable embodiments of value, ultimately gold and silver,  became for those reasons both widely desirable as well as particularly at risk for theft, or debasing.  Thus,  intermediaries were entrusted with the safe keeping of these. These intermiediaries were compensated with percentages of those same commodities,  which was what has come to be known as interest.

Once that scenario became common, it was easy to fall into the intuitively compelling but erroneous notion of assuming that the universal desire for such commodities somehow conferred on measures of these the properties of a universal measure of all and any value. Only once that misrepresentation had taken root,  was the issuance of trust disassociated from the delivery of goods and services to that of the delivery of society's most desired commodities i.e gold and silver.

Following the above, the practice of marking the gold and silver, initially to authenticate its purity gave rise to coins and then as an extension of this,  issuance of bills representing amounts of coins became a further measure for both maintaining the purity as well as reducing the risk of loss or theft in transport.

Subsequently, the idea of manipulating the quantity of bills to match the required levels of trust in trade rather than the actual gold, became irresistible not just for illicit ends but legitimate ends too. But the link to the gold maintained the general notion of relative scarcity of the bills as well as the idea of proportional retribution for the administration of the bills in terms of the bills and proportionately amounts of the underlying commodity (gold/silver).  This is what gave rise to what is known as "fiat" currency.

Finally, in the 20th century the link between these bills (money) and gold was abandoned yet the same operative model of money as a circulating commodity paid for itself in terms of itself and proportionally,  as well as the disassociation of trust from the provision of goods and services to that of money instead were maintained. That is, we came full circle from a commodity being conferred properties of a universal abstract measure of the all value to a record empty of any intrinsic value being conferred the attributes of a commodity. In both cases, the same erred conflation of interpreting money as both a measure of value as well as a commodity persisted as an intuitively compelling logical error that mathematically destablises money's necessary function as a stable record (measure) of universal value.

The (il)logic of that error is what the MSTA and www.bibocurrency.com projects point out in unequivocally conclusive formal logical and legal terms,  as well as demonstrating how correcting that error allows for maintaining the use of money as a means of "liquidity" without divorcing the issuance of trust from the delivery of real value (goods and services) in each and any instance independently but pursuant to a common standard stable measure of value.

For more on money as a measure vs credit see  Money vs Credit  and The Austerity Fallacy.


 

 

 

Break out of  "The Money PSYOP" and give your kids

a future they can be proud of you for by supporting the MSTA


 

 

Saints in Hell

By Marc Gauvin

Copyright © 4/10/2018
Reproduction expressly granted provided attribution is given and original link is provided.

 

Essentially, if the world were made up of saints that for whatever reason unwittingly embraced our current misrepresentation of money as an immutable fact and thus assumed in a spirit of honesty its subsequent logical imperatives as equally inevitable, the systemic effect of such collective adherence would produce the same insane and unconscionable levels of inequity we witness today. Each saint being attributed responsibility in terms of their circumstance rather than their deeper saintly nature. Those seeking equity, justice, fairness, compassion and integrity in themselves and others oblivious of how such behaviour is precluded by such systemics, would become tyrannical in their quest or abandon all hope.

The key to undoing the vast compounding calamity we are witnessing in the world, believe it or not, lies in correcting that single most ubiquitous and influential proposition that all are conditioned to incorporate in their lives as an immutable fact, known to all as simply "money" as currently misrepresented.

The beauty of this, is that doing so (correcting money's misrepresentation), under no circumstances can be misconstrued as harmful to anyone in any way, nor can it empower anyone or any group over the rest, it simply means greater transparency and massive reduction of risks and liabilities across the board and for all rich and poor and it represents empowerment of all the causes that while no one would deny, are never served because of our current financial prerogatives under the yoke of money's misrepresentation not any other human or material resource limits.

The knowledge of money's misrepresentation and the prospect of correcting it, is not a fantastical wishful dream, it is a hard hitting factual disruption of a nightmare the type that can only engender a deep sense of relief once one is fully awakened from it,  as it is a cause to enable all causes.

 

 

 

 

Break out of  "The Money PSYOP" and give your kids

a future they can be proud of you for by supporting the MSTA


 

Money's Misrepresentation and History

By Marc Gauvin

"Remove the misrepresentation of money without implementing a mathematical homologue and the history of human civilisation could never have occurred as it has, as without the underlying mathematics of said misrepresentaiton such a phenomenon is simply impossible."

Copyright © 07/2017
Reproduction expressly granted provided attribution is given and original link is provided.


Arguments that invoke an unspecified cause to undermine acting on a clearly specified causality is the standard method of those who wittingly or unwittingly sow and nurture learned helplessness. It is tantamount to arguing that preventing people from whipping is futile because they will just find new ways to abuse each other, without specifying the nature and requirements of those "new ways".

The truth of the matter is that the misrepresentation of money for millennia and at least since Babylonia, has been a crucial element of social organisation and indeed in the forming of ALL military efforts since biblical times. Without the sharing of "riches" with plundering soldiers be it in the form of gold coin conceived erroneously as the "measure of ALL things" as Aristotle put it, or Babylon's Hammurabi code's use of silver coin for "taxes" also implying money as a "measure of all things", we would not have had the development of states as we know them today nor would these states have had the same imperatives to colonise so criminally as has been the case. 

But just as we don't need to study the history of flat earth thinking to know that the world is round nor study why Aristotle believed acceleration due to gravity was due to the properties of objects to know that all objects accelerate at the same rate independently of their mass, we don't need to study all the history of world domination to identify the unique nature of money's current logical misrepresentation as a tool of "domination".  As without such a study we can perfectly deduce how the the systemic effects resulting from the mathematics that arise from such a misrepresentation are sine qua non to achieving the kind of perceived imperative capable of generating the collective behaviour that marks human history.  Remove the misrepresentation of money without implementing a mathematical homologue and the history of human civilisation could never have occurred as it has, as without the underlying mathematics of said misrepresentation, such a phenomenon is simply impossible.

Those who require others to study history in order to validate what can be wholly ascertained directly are nothing more than sophists seeking to control discourse for ulterior motives.


Break out of  "The Money PSYOP" and give your kids

a future they can be proud of you for by supporting the MSTA

 

 

Additional information