Money's Misrepresentation and History

Money's Misrepresentation and History

By Marc Gauvin

"Remove the misrepresentation of money without implementing a mathematical homologue and the history of human civilisation could never have occurred as it has, as without the underlying mathematics of said misrepresentaiton such a phenomenon is simply impossible."

Copyright © 07/2017
Reproduction expressly granted provided attribution is given and original link is provided.


Arguments that invoke an unspecified cause to undermine acting on a clearly specified causality is the standard method of those who wittingly or unwittingly sow and nurture learned helplessness. It is tantamount to arguing that preventing people from whipping is futile because they will just find new ways to abuse each other, without specifying the nature and requirements of those "new ways".

The truth of the matter is that the misrepresentation of money for millennia and at least since Babylonia, has been a crucial element of social organisation and indeed in the forming of ALL military efforts since biblical times. Without the sharing of "riches" with plundering soldiers be it in the form of gold coin conceived erroneously as the "measure of ALL things" as Aristotle put it, or Babylon's Hammurabi code's use of silver coin for "taxes" also implying money as a "measure of all things", we would not have had the development of states as we know them today nor would these states have had the same imperatives to colonise so criminally as has been the case. 

But just as we don't need to study the history of flat earth thinking to know that the world is round nor study why Aristotle believed acceleration due to gravity was due to the properties of objects to know that all objects accelerate at the same rate independently of their mass, we don't need to study all the history of world domination to identify the unique nature of money's current logical misrepresentation as a tool of "domination".  As without such a study we can perfectly deduce how the the systemic effects resulting from the mathematics that arise from such a misrepresentation are sine qua non to achieving the kind of perceived imperative capable of generating the collective behaviour that marks human history.  Remove the misrepresentation of money without implementing a mathematical homologue and the history of human civilisation could never have occurred as it has, as without the underlying mathematics of said misrepresentation, such a phenomenon is simply impossible.

Those who require others to study history in order to validate what can be wholly ascertained directly are nothing more than sophists seeking to control discourse for ulterior motives.


Break out of  "The Money PSYOP" and give your kids

a future they can be proud of you for by supporting the MSTA

 

 

Systemic vs Moral Reform

Systemic vs Moral Reform

By Marc Gauvin

"...We CANNOT reform user behaviour under a system without first removing the SYSTEMIC effect that produces that behaviour..."

Copyright © 07/2017
Reproduction expressly granted provided attribution is given and original link is provided.


This short article is perhaps one of the most important I have ever written,  as it contains the proof of how almost all popularised dissent against the evil in society is erred and only serves to energise the very paradigm that produces said evil. 

The error is not understanding the critical difference between the
SYSTEMIC effect of a design governing behaviour within that design,  from the effects of user behaviour on the nature of that design.  

The game of musical chairs illustrates this perfectly as it is the design of the game that determines that a minimum of players will be left without chairs no matter how the players dance when the music is playing.  It is therefore absurd to expect to solve the problem of chair-less players by modifying how players dance (behave) without first changing the design of the game. 
We CANNOT reform user behaviour under a system without first removing the SYSTEMIC effect that produces that behaviour.

Similarly,  it is absurd to invoke individual human behaviour as the cause of the rich getting richer and the poor poorer without first addressing the systemic effect that makes such behaviour imperative within society.  What is that effect? 

We have formally proven that money's logical misrepresentation
necessarily produces the following SYSTEMIC effects:

  1. Stability of the value of asset holdings is systemically precluded.

  2. Asset value can only increase or decrease.

  3. The probability of decreasing asset value is systemically made greater than that of increasing it NO MATTER HOW RICH YOU ARE (inflation/deflation).

So, if we confuse the SYSTEMIC effect of logically misrepresenting money,  with the effects of the morality or lack thereof of people's behaviour under the yoke of said misrepresentation, we are doomed to greater divisiveness, alienation, animosity, belligerence, mistrust, condemnation without ever impacting the underlying source of the "immoral" behaviour. 

It therefore follows, that any explicit or implicit appeal to morality as the solution to the world's problems without first addressing the SYSTEMIC effect of money on everyone's behaviour (
rich and poor) is not only futile, but only further fuels the problem, as the futility of such pomposity squanders our collective resolve leading us all to greater and greater states of learned helplessness making us ever more impervious to true change.  Such guilt based approaches, ultimately serve to implicitly blame the victims of abuse by demanding moral infallibility while ignoring the root abuse of money's misrepresentation on everyone.

 

 

Break out of  "The Money PSYOP" and give your kids

a future they can be proud of you for by supporting the MSTA

 

Avarice or Universal Fear of Loss and Exclusion

By Marc Gauvin

Copyright © 06/2017
Reproduction expressly granted provided attribution is given and original link is provided.

 

 "...we can now understand how by correcting the current misrepresentation of money the common interests of both rich and poor are served,  how the so called rich are acting on the very same imperatives as do the poor induced by a faulty system assumed by all, rather than any master plan attributable to any evil cabal."

 

The problem at hand is that money's current commonly assumed misrepresentation is being implemented as legally valid in spite of both rich and poor being equally unable to assess nor fathom its systemic effects.   As a consequence,  ALL are compelled to obey the system dictates for fear of loss and/or future exclusion,  without ever fathoming the mathematically demonstrable irrationality of said misrepresentation and how the following corollaries due to the subsequent system instability persist no matter how "rich" or "poor" one is:  

  1. Stability of the value of any asset holdings is systematically precluded.

  2. Asset value can only increase or decrease.

  3. The probability of decreasing asset value is systematically made greater than that of increasing it NO MATTER HOW RICH YOU ARE.

In light of the above,  it becomes clear how the current unconscionable wealth accumulation occurs as a function of the system itself and how it is driven by a universal sense of fear of loss as opposed to by an insatiable desire for unbounded wealth and power on the part of an "elite" class. 

The importance of this cannot be underestimated because understanding the above allows us to view the money problem rationally in terms of the science of the matter as opposed to the standard irrational and highly divisive demagoguery of left/right, rich/poor, virtuous/vicious discourse that only serves to intensify the already acute  fear of loss and exclusion instilled and systematised by the root misrepresentation of money.   

By understanding the mathematics of how the misrepresentation of money destroys money's function as a stable measure and therefore record of value independently of one's wealth,  we can now understand how by correcting the current misrepresentation of money the common interests of both rich and poor are served,  how the so called rich are acting on the very same imperatives as do the poor induced by a faulty system assumed  by all,  rather than by any master plan attributable to any evil cabal.  It is the system based on an irrational premise that we all unwittingly embrace in our day to day actions that creates the systematisation of wrongs we all deplore. 

This is why it is imperative that we all stop blaming and condemning and focus on the true science of money that will liberate us all from its current logical misrepresentation and the insane predicament it puts us all in whether rich or poor.   As it is this misrepresentation alone that allows for the subsequent systematic instability that underlies the universal fear of loss and exclusion that otherwise would not exist and that persists no matter one's station in life.

To learn more of how you can get involved in promoting the cause to enable all causes go to www.moneytransparency.com.

 

Break out of "The Money PSYOP" and give your kids

a future they can be proud of you for.

True Change

True Change

By Marc Gauvin

"...Any action that is deemed legal and is conclusive in nature can be undertaken independently of any ballots!"

Copyright © 07/2017
Reproduction expressly granted provided attribution is given and original link is provided.

 

All know that I think politics is a circus that only serves to distract us.  But why? How can we get anything done without it?  Isn't politics the only civilised way to exercise collective self government and self determination, etc.?  Let's think a bit about all that.

As I have said on many occasions, true meaningful change can only occur on the basis of conclusive knowledge and direct lawful actions.  Therefore, we don't need to vote on whether or not the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, nor if the materials of the bridge we want to build meet the specified stress requirements.  We don't need to vote to preserve life and dignity nor how, within the law, we defend ourselves from criminal activity, nor to determine what our life work is going to be. 

What then is voting for?  Voting decides on what is inconclusive by nature,  for example while we won't vote on a bridges stress specifications something decided by conclusive scientific, logical and legal criteria, we are "free" to vote on other otherwise inconclusive criteria such as the colour we wish to paint the bridge.   So, it follows that,

any action that is deemed legal and is conclusive in nature can be undertaken independently of any ballots!

Therein lies the key,  in so far as politics, by not clearly differentiating between what is conclusive and what is not, distracts or otherwise prevents us from taking all the conclusive and legal actions we require, it is a circus.  Remember also,  that any existing law can ultimately be challenged in the courts on the basis of fundamental principles of Justice and Law which in order to garner credibility must be based in conclusive knowledge and facts i.e. natural law subject to valid (objective) reasoning and/or logic!

From the above, it should follow that we ought to be free to transform our society directly through conclusive knowledge and lawful action independently of politics.  But, if we haven't exhausted all meaningful conclusive knowledge and lawful actions to solve our problems and we certainly have not, why are we so exclusively focussed on politics as the only means for collectively effecting change?  What is it in our society that renders such lawful conclusive actions effectively inconclusive by requiring approval by ballot!

The answer to this question,  is money and finance, money entirely circumscribes our ability to act not through imperatives of any rich nor poor individuals or collectives, but by a "logic" most everyone has unwittingly assumed to be as immutable as natural law.  A logic that has us limiting our freedom far beyond what would otherwise lawfully be the case.

The question then is,  if and how money adheres to the aforementioned principles of Justice, Law (objectivity, impartiality, logical/rational consistency and natural law (i.e. facts)).  If it doesn't then we must act conclusively and lawfully to correct said logic and do so independently of any ballots!

This is what the Money Systems Transparency Alliance (MSTA) is all about and where it is shown how money is effectively not formally specified anywhere nor logically (i.e. conclusively) determined, with the result being that we are all currently operating on a de facto common notion of money that can only be classified as a misinterpretation

It is for this reason, that politics has become at the very best a side show and in spite of popular belief,  not the ultimate forum for change as for that,  we must first deal with the money issue outside of politics!   For this reason, we need everyone to support the MSTA truly a cause to enable all causes


Break out of  "The Money PSYOP" and give your kids

a future they can be proud of you for by supporting the MSTA




 

Idiot Sages

Age of Idiot Sages

By Marc Gauvin

Copyright © 06/2017
Reproduction expressly granted provided attribution is given and original link is provided.

 "Unlike eastern sages and other mystics, who use puzzles to point at what cannot be uttered but can be experienced, Idiot Sages transform what can never be experienced into a puzzle that can be uttered."

Similar to Idiot Savants,  that while able to memorise entire phone book listings do not know what the numbers are for,  Idiot Sages aka "gate keepers", memorise the minutiae of current events without a clue of what is required to solve any of the underlying problems.

Idiot Sages exploit the generalised inability to distinguish correlation from causation to monopolise "public opinion" and direct it along any number of  fruitless demagoguery and identity politics ridden paths to well,  absolutely nowhere. They are the best gatekeepers precisely because the gates they keep, go nowhere in spite of hoards trying to get through them.  Which is all the reason for not letting anyone in,  except of course those who don't know the difference between somewhere and nowhere, i.e. other gate keepers or gate keeper minions. 

How do we detect Idiot Sages?  Well,  they generally speak with a monotone matter of fact demeanour and while
deliberately excluding causation from their discourse, leave their audience to collectively determine it (causation). If any individual comes up with plausible causation, they immediately deny it unless of course they determine that it leads nowhere i.e. is wrong,  in which case they add it to their repertoire as another "interesting point of view".  Idiot Sages rarely display emotion, except when they are reassured that no one will expose their pointless meandering,  in which case they may display the kind of timid smirk not unsimilar to that a con artist would, upon confirming that their mark has irrevocably stepped into the scam. 

Unlike eastern sages and other mystics, who use puzzles to point at what cannot be uttered but can be experienced, Idiot Sages transform what can never be experienced into a puzzle that can be uttered.

Idiot Sages are valued on the basis of their popular following for which others, usually with lots of cash, are responsible,  which is why some Idiot Sages are also labelled "Useful Idiots".

 

Break out of "The Money PSYOP" and give your kids

a future they can be proud of you for.

Additional information